Is ZAMA Worth Investing In or Will It End Up Like Monad? Full Analysis
2026-02-16
The crypto market has seen this pattern before: a technically ambitious Layer 1 emerges, venture capital flows in, community hype builds and then reality tests the narrative. Now, the spotlight is on ZAMA, a cryptography-focused project centered on Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE).
The big question: is ZAMA a long-term breakthrough, or could it follow a path similar to Monad’s controversial launch?
Investors are understandably cautious. The comparison between ZAMA and Monad is not about identical technology, it is about execution, tokenomics, transparency, and delivery under pressure.
Key Takeaways
ZAMA focuses on real cryptographic utility (FHE), not just speed narratives.
Monad’s controversies centered on tokenomics, distribution, and trust erosion.
ZAMA’s investment potential depends heavily on future token structure and mainnet delivery.
Trade with confidence. Bitrue is a secure and trusted crypto trading platform for buying, selling, and trading Bitcoin and altcoins.
Register Now to Claim Your Prize!
What Happened With Monad?
Monad positioned itself as a high-performance EVM Layer 1 promising 10,000+ TPS through a parallel execution model. On paper, it looked revolutionary. In practice, the launch phase exposed several cracks.
Testnet Controversy
Shortly after testnet activation, spoofed $MON transfers appeared, triggering panic about potential exploits. While no financial losses occurred, the optics were damaging. In crypto, perception can weigh as heavily as code.
Tokenomics Backlash
The token debuted below presale price. Approximately 50% of supply was allocated to team members and insiders. Airdrop distribution was minimal, frustrating early community participants. Heavy VC allocations led to post-launch selling pressure, capping upside and accelerating trust erosion.
Hype vs. Proof
Despite technical claims and reported throughput performance, the community questioned whether real-world adoption justified valuation levels. Hype fatigue quickly replaced enthusiasm.
The lesson? Technology alone does not guarantee investor returns. Execution, fairness, and market structure matter.
Read Also: Introduction to ZAMA Crypto Project: Complete Overview
What Is ZAMA?
Zama is building infrastructure around Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), a cryptographic breakthrough allowing computations on encrypted data without decrypting it.
In simpler terms: smart contracts can process private data without exposing it on-chain.
Why FHE Matters
FHE addresses one of blockchain’s structural weaknesses: privacy. Today, DeFi transactions are transparent. Confidential lending, encrypted AI computation, and private financial logic remain limited.
ZAMA’s fhEVM aims to integrate FHE directly into an Ethereum-compatible environment. That means developers could build confidential smart contracts using familiar tooling.
Funding Strength
ZAMA has raised $73 million from investors including Multicoin Capital and Protocol Labs. Institutional backing signals confidence in the technical roadmap. However, it also introduces the familiar VC-weight risk seen in many Layer 1 ecosystems.
Current Status
Testnet active
No reported fake transfer scandals
No token launched yet
Mainnet expected around 2026
The absence of a token eliminates immediate dump risk. But it also leaves tokenomics uncertainty unresolved.
Read Also: Zama: Pioneering Privacy in the Digital Age with Fully Homomorphic Encryption
ZAMA vs Monad Comparison
The comparison is not about identical flaws. It is about pattern recognition.
ZAMA Token Potential: Strengths and Risks
Strength 1: Solving a Real Problem
Unlike speed-focused chains competing for marginal TPS gains, ZAMA targets encrypted computation as a genuine unsolved infrastructure gap.
If FHE integration works at scale, it could redefine DeFi privacy and AI-on-chain models.
Strength 2: Cleaner Early Execution
No spoofed token events. No botched airdrop narrative. No insider-dump headlines. So far, execution appears disciplined.
Risk 1: VC Allocation Transparency
The $73M funding round raises a key question: how much of future token supply will go to insiders?
If allocation mirrors aggressive VC-heavy models, long-term price stability could suffer.
Risk 2: Mainnet Delivery Timeline
The 2026 mainnet target means extended pre-revenue speculation. Crypto history shows that prolonged hype cycles often test investor patience.
Risk 3: Narrative Saturation
Layer 1 narratives are cyclical. Even strong tech can struggle if the market rotates toward modular chains, rollups, or AI-native ecosystems instead.
Read Also: ZAMA Crypto Price Prediction and Analysis 2026
Crypto Project Due Diligence: What to Watch Before Investing
Before considering ZAMA token exposure, monitor these variables:
1. Tokenomics Disclosure
Look for:
Insider allocation percentage
Vesting schedules
Community airdrop allocation
Inflation rate
2. Security Audits
Review smart contract audits and cryptographic peer review validation.
3. Developer Adoption
FHE only matters if developers build on it. Watch GitHub activity, ecosystem grants, and dApp integrations.
4. Market Timing
Launching in a bull market vs. a liquidity-constrained environment changes everything.
Is ZAMA Worth Investing In?
ZAMA currently appears structurally stronger than Monad at comparable stages. It addresses a deeper infrastructure gap and has avoided early reputational missteps.
However, without a launched token, published tokenomics, or mainnet validation, it remains a high-risk, early-stage infrastructure bet.
If you are seeking long-term asymmetric upside and can tolerate volatility, ZAMA may deserve monitoring.
If you are looking for short-term speculative flips, waiting for clarity on token distribution and launch mechanics may be wiser.
In crypto, execution separates vision from valuation.
Read Also: ZAMA Token Price Forecast Q1–Q4 2026
Conclusion
ZAMA stands at an inflection point. Its Fully Homomorphic Encryption thesis offers genuine technical innovation. Yet history shows that funding strength and ambitious roadmaps do not guarantee sustainable token performance.
The decisive factors will be transparent tokenomics, disciplined launch strategy, and real-world adoption. Until those materialize, treat ZAMA as a watchlist opportunity rather than a blind allocation.
Always conduct independent research and manage exposure strategically.
FAQ
What is ZAMA?
ZAMA is a blockchain cryptography project developing Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) solutions for confidential smart contracts.
Does ZAMA have a token yet?
No. The ZAMA token has not launched, and tokenomics details remain undisclosed.
What were the main issues with Monad?
Monad faced backlash over spoofed testnet transfers, heavy insider token allocation, and post-launch selling pressure.
Is ZAMA safer than Monad?
So far, ZAMA has avoided similar controversies, but long-term safety depends on token structure and mainnet execution.
Should I invest in ZAMA now?
Consider waiting for tokenomics disclosure and mainnet progress before making allocation decisions.
Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.
Disclaimer: The content of this article does not constitute financial or investment advice.
