ZachXBT Calls Out Ripple, Saying XRP Community Adds No Value
2025-08-30
Crypto investigator ZachXBT, known for his sharp critiques of the industry, recently targeted the Ripple ecosystem with a series of blunt observations.
At the center of his criticism lies the XRP community, which ZachXBT accuses of providing no real value beyond “exit liquidity” for insiders.
His comments have reignited controversy, challenging both the utility of XRP and the motivations of its holders, while shining a light on the broader dynamics within crypto communities often overlooked in bullish narratives.
ZachXBT’s Core Accusations Against XRP Holders
ZachXBT argues that XRP holders essentially act as exit liquidity, enabling early insiders like Ripple’s founders to offload their tokens profitably. This pattern, he suggests, enriches insiders at the expense of retail investors who remain trapped in depreciating assets.
According to him, XRP’s token distribution is heavily skewed, with a large percentage controlled by Ripple insiders, which diminishes the token’s decentralization and restricts fair market growth.
He points out that the XRP community behaves in a manner reminiscent of cult-like fervor—defensively promoting the token and focusing on price rallies rather than technological innovation or ecosystem-building.
This aggressive promotion, in ZachXBT’s view, masks the fundamental issues like lack of meaningful updates and limited real-world applications beyond speculative trading.
Ripple’s Funding and Support Criticized
Beyond the community, ZachXBT criticizes Ripple itself for no longer funding initiatives that add public value or support the broader XRP ecosystem. He contrasts Ripple’s approach with other projects that actively invest in public goods, developer tools, and ecosystem expansion.
From his perspective, Ripple’s stingy funding strategy leaves community members and developers unsupported, intensifying the risks for holders amid scams and regulatory uncertainties.
ZachXBT urges XRP investors to rely on self-custody and caution, especially in navigating fraud prevalent in the ecosystem. He encourages victims of scams involving XRP to report incidents to law enforcement bodies and to vigilantly track stolen assets, highlighting how poor corporate backing exacerbates these vulnerabilities.
Community and Industry Reactions
The crypto community’s response to ZachXBT’s statements has been divided. Some supporters praise his transparency, agreeing that Ripple benefits insiders more than the wider base of holders.
They point to insider sales—such as a $175 million XRP transfer by co-founder Chris Larsen—as evidence of the exit liquidity narrative. Critics underscore XRP’s highly concentrated ownership and the potential for market manipulation.
Conversely, defenders argue that ZachXBT underestimates Ripple’s real-world utility and institutional partnerships, particularly in cross-border payments and potential ETF approvals.
Some liken insider token sales to standard corporate behavior seen in traditional markets, where founders monetize holdings without necessarily harming the project’s prospects. These voices emphasize XRP’s growing government adoption and technological development to counter accusations of speculative excess.
Read Also: Is Zora Worth The Hype? A Deeper Look At The Zachxbt Controversy And Content Coin Debate
Broader Implications for Crypto Communities
ZachXBT’s critique transcends XRP alone, lumping it with other large altcoins like Cardano and Hedera, which he similarly labels as “insider enrichment schemes.”
He decries the proliferation of projects resembling multi-level marketing structures, dependent more on recruiting new buyers than genuine innovation.
Such communities, according to him, often devolve into price-promotion cults disconnected from advancing blockchain technology.
His observations raise important questions about sustainability and ethics in crypto investing. The debate highlights the tension between hype-driven markets and the need for transparent, value-driven project development. For investors and enthusiasts, ZachXBT’s comments serve as a reminder to scrutinize not only the technology but the ecosystem’s dynamics and incentive structures.
Conclusion
ZachXBT’s scathing call-out of the XRP community and Ripple’s insiders adds fuel to ongoing debates around crypto ownership, utility, and market fairness. While XRP has recorded significant price gains and institutional interest, the allegations of exit liquidity and limited support challenge the narrative of unqualified optimism.
As blockchain ecosystems mature, the demand for accountability, decentralization, and genuine innovation will likely intensify, shaping how projects like Ripple evolve and how communities engage in the future.
FAQ
What does ZachXBT mean by XRP holders being "exit liquidity"?
He suggests retail holders provide a pool of tokens that insiders sell into, benefiting insiders while leaving retail investors exposed to losses.
Why does ZachXBT criticize Ripple’s funding approach?
He claims Ripple no longer finances community projects or public goods, reducing support for ecosystem growth and investor protection.
How has the XRP community responded to these accusations?
Reactions are mixed—some agree with the criticisms, while others cite Ripple's partnerships and adoption to defend its value.
Are insider sales uncommon in crypto?
No, insider token sales happen across projects, but ZachXBT argues Ripple’s concentrated holdings make the impact more harmful.
What broader issues does ZachXBT highlight for crypto communities?
He warns against cult-like behavior, aggressive price-promotion, and projects resembling pyramid schemes without meaningful innovation.
Disclaimer: The content of this article does not constitute financial or investment advice.
