President Trump took to social media late Monday, declaring what he called “a complete and total ceasefire” between Iran and Israel. 

Just hours later, both sides were once again accusing each other of fresh missile launches. So what is going on? Is peace finally possible in one of the world’s most volatile regions, or are we witnessing another brief pause in a much deeper conflict?

Differences Between What Trump Claims and Reality

Donald Trump announced early Tuesday that a ceasefire between Israel and Iran had officially begun. 

He timed it for around midnight Eastern Time, suggesting that both parties had agreed to halt all offensive actions following deadly airstrikes over the weekend. 

The message was met with cautious optimism, as both Iranian and Israeli media acknowledged that a ceasefire had indeed begun, though not without confusion over the specifics.

Shortly after the announcement, however, reports emerged that Israel had intercepted two incoming missiles from Iran. The Israeli Defence Forces accused Iran of violating the truce, prompting Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz to authorise further military operations. 

Iran, meanwhile, firmly denied firing any missiles after the ceasefire took effect. According to a senior Iranian security official speaking to CNN, “no missiles have been fired at the enemy so far” since 7:30 a.m. local time.

These conflicting narratives have created an atmosphere of uncertainty. While the United States may have facilitated a temporary agreement, the practical enforcement of that ceasefire is far from guaranteed. 

Israel continues to maintain that it achieved “tremendous success” in its military campaign, claiming to have dismantled both nuclear and missile threats in Iran. At the same time, it warned that any violation would be met with a firm response.

This raises the question: Is Trump declaring victory too early, or is this a calculated political move in an election year? The ceasefire may technically be “in effect,” but both sides appear far from standing down.

Read more: Trump and US Evil Plan to Push for Regime Change in Iran

Israeli and Iranian Reactions: Scepticism and Strategic Messaging

In the immediate aftermath of Trump’s announcement, both Israeli and Iranian officials delivered statements that painted very different pictures of the situation. 

Iranian state media were quick to deny any breach of the ceasefire, labelling Israeli reports of missile strikes as false and politically motivated. One outlet claimed the allegations were designed to discredit Iran on the international stage.

Meanwhile, Israel’s leadership was far less conciliatory. Defence Minister Katz reiterated that any attacks on Israeli soil would provoke a powerful military response. 

Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir echoed this stance, saying Israel would continue operations to strike Tehran and disrupt what it called “terror infrastructure.”

Interestingly, reactions from Israeli lawmakers showed a mix of views. Some, such as Avigdor Lieberman and Yair Lapid, warned against withdrawing too soon and emphasised the need for ongoing pressure. 

Others saw this as an opportunity to begin rebuilding and shift focus to Gaza, with opposition leader Lapid calling on Israel to “end the war and bring the hostages home.”

Yair Golan, a member of the Democrats party, took a more analytical stance, questioning whether the ceasefire could effectively limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities and what mechanisms were in place should it be violated. 

Far-right figures like Bezalel Smotrich celebrated what they described as a “crushing victory” and called for renewed operations in Gaza.

These diverse reactions show that, even within Israel, the ceasefire is viewed with suspicion. Some see it as a tactical pause, others as a chance to pivot, but few trust it to hold long term. 

Iran’s silence on enforcement mechanisms only adds to the uncertainty. Despite agreeing to the ceasefire, both sides remain alert and prepared for renewed conflict.

Read more: Iran-Israel Conflict Heats Up

What This Means for Global Markets and US Foreign Policy

Beyond the political implications, the ceasefire announcement triggered immediate responses from global markets, especially the oil sector. 

Prices dropped sharply on news of a deal, with West Texas Intermediate crude falling 3.7% and Brent crude dropping 3.8% during European trading hours. 

This came after an already volatile period, in which US crude had plunged over 7% following Iran’s missile attacks on American bases in Qatar.

The markets clearly see a potential ceasefire as easing supply concerns. But that relief may be short-lived. 

With missile exchanges still being reported and political leaders threatening further action, investors are left guessing how stable the situation truly is.

As for US foreign policy, Trump’s messaging has shifted dramatically in just 48 hours. After ordering targeted strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, he is now promoting himself as a peacemaker. 

Speaking to NBC, he called the ceasefire “unlimited” and claimed it would last “forever.” He went so far as to suggest that Iran and Israel will never fight again.

These are bold statements in a region known for prolonged conflict and fragile agreements. Critics have already warned that Trump may be more focused on public relations than long-term diplomacy. 

While the ceasefire may buy time, it does not resolve the underlying disputes over territory, nuclear ambitions, or regional influence.

In practical terms, the US has signalled a temporary disengagement. Whether that lasts will depend on how Iran and Israel behave in the coming days. 

If attacks resume, the US may be pulled back into the conflict sooner than expected. For now, Trump appears satisfied that he has calmed tensions, even if only temporarily.

Read more: Can I Use Bitrue Alpha as a Beginner? A Full Guide

Conclusion

Trump’s declaration of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran has sparked cautious hope, but on-the-ground realities suggest it is far from stable. 

With missile accusations, political contradictions, and ongoing threats of retaliation, the situation remains highly volatile. While the truce may offer a brief pause, both sides are still posturing for advantage. 

For those following global events and their impact on financial markets or crypto assets, this highlights the importance of reliable trading platforms. Bitrue offers a safer and easier way to manage your crypto exposure during uncertain times.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Did Iran and Israel really agree to a ceasefire?

Yes, both sides initially confirmed a ceasefire, but accusations of violations have followed within hours.

2. What did Trump say about the ceasefire?

Trump claimed the ceasefire was “complete and total” and predicted it would last forever. However, events since then suggest ongoing tension.

3. How did markets react to the announcement?

Oil prices dropped sharply after the ceasefire was announced, reflecting reduced fears of supply disruptions.

Investor Caution 

While the crypto hype has been exciting, remember that the crypto space can be volatile. Always conduct your research, assess your risk tolerance, and consider the long-term potential of any investment.

Bitrue Official Website:

Website: https://www.bitrue.com/

Sign Up: https://www.bitrue.com/user/register

Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.