Is 0x Protocol Still Active? Looking at Its Twitter Feed

The question surrounding 0x Protocol’s relevance resurfaces periodically often during quieter market phases or when newer narratives dominate headlines. Yet activity does not always manifest as hype. 

Sometimes, it shows up in quieter signals: governance threads, deployment logs, and yes, Twitter feeds. By examining 0x Protocol’s recent social activity, on-chain presence, and ecosystem integrations, a clearer picture emerges, one that suggests continuity rather than decline.

This analysis explores whether 0x is merely surviving, or still meaningfully operating within today’s fragmented, multi-chain DeFi landscape.

Reading the Signals: 0x Protocol’s Twitter Activity

Social channels often serve as a project’s pulse. For infrastructure protocols like 0x, the tone matters more than virality.

Ongoing Engagement on @zeroexprotocol

The official @zeroexprotocol Twitter account remains visibly active, with posts extending into March 2024 and beyond. These updates are not marketing-heavy announcements, but operational communications treasury vote alerts, governance reminders, scam warnings, and deployment notices.

One notable example includes warnings about fake ZRX airdrops circulating in March 2024. While such posts may appear reactive, they signal something important: an actively monitored ecosystem with users worth protecting.

Governance and Grants in Public View

Earlier posts highlight governance proposals tied to protocol development. Discussions around $25,000 grants for features like BundleSwap and Batch Multiplex were surfaced publicly, with voting activity tracked through December 2023. 

This suggests that 0x continues to treat governance as a transparent, community-facing process rather than a dormant formality.

Parallel activity on the @0xProject account reinforces this narrative, often emphasizing integrations with decentralized exchanges such as SwyrlFi and broader ecosystem tooling.

Read Also: Lighter (LIT) Price Prediction 2025–2030: How High Could LIT Go?

Market and Protocol Status: Beyond Social Media

Twitter alone is insufficient evidence. Market data and protocol usage provide a more objective lens.

ZRX Token Activity and Liquidity

ZRX continues to trade actively, hovering around the $0.17 range with approximately $129 million in daily trading volume. These figures place it well above the threshold of abandoned or illiquid tokens. More importantly, ZRX retains functional relevance, it is not a vestigial asset, but a governance token tied directly to ZEIPs and treasury decisions.

CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap both position ZRX as integral to protocol governance rather than speculative utility alone.

Protocol Throughput and Historical Scale

0x infrastructure has facilitated over $200 billion in total trading volume and remains embedded across hundreds of Web3 applications. This scale does not vanish quietly. Even if growth plateaus, the installed base of integrations creates inertia protocols must actively fail to disappear.

The official 0x website continues to promote APIs supporting financial applications across more than ten blockchain networks, underscoring its role as backend infrastructure rather than a consumer-facing product.

Read Also: Why Is MED Trending? Analyzing Its Use Cases

Ecosystem Integrations: Quiet, Persistent Utility

Infrastructure relevance is best measured where users don’t see it.

Real-World Usage via Interface and Others

Case studies such as Interface demonstrate how 0x v2 powers social feed swaps, enabling users to trade directly within content environments. Supporting over seven million tokens, this integration highlights a subtle but powerful trend: swaps embedded into experiences, not isolated in trading terminals.

Meanwhile, explorer.0x.org continues to track usage across decentralized exchanges, wallets, and aggregators evidence of sustained transactional relevance rather than archival status.

Governance Activity: Slow, Not Silent

A common misconception equates fewer votes with abandonment. Governance data suggests otherwise.

Recent ZEIP Discussions and Forum Activity

The 0x governance forum shows continued engagement into mid-2025. Proposals may attract modest reply counts, but view metrics often in the hundreds indicate ongoing community attention.

Key discussions include:

• A May 21, 2025 proposal to reinstate protocol fees

• An April 2025 RFC for a comprehensive governance dashboard

• Threads addressing unstaking mechanics and Optimism fund allocation

Even contentious topics, such as July 2025’s “ZRX Ended Up Being a Scam” discussion, point to something critical: people are still debating the protocol, not ignoring it.

How Governance Still Functions

The governance process remains intact and structured. Proposals originate on the forum, move to Snapshot for off-chain signaling, and advance on-chain only if thresholds are met. Treasury-related decisions require significant ZRX participation, while core upgrades pass through a timelock system.

This architecture favors deliberate evolution over rapid experimentation consistent with infrastructure protocols that prioritize stability.

Read Also: CLV Coin Price Prediction for 2026-2028: Here’s the Analysis!

Multi-Chain Deployments and Technical Expansion

Development activity often hides in changelogs rather than headlines.

Recent Deployments and Integrations

0x continues to deploy across major networks. Recent updates include:

• Uniswap v4 support across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, BNB Chain, Optimism, Polygon, and more

• Settler contract deployments on Unichain and Berachain

• Swaap v2 MVP integration

• New liquidity sources such as Fluid Lite (Ethereum) and Spark PSM (Base)

These are not experimental testnets. They are production-grade integrations aligned with where liquidity is moving.

Expanding Chain Support

The protocol now supports an extensive list of mainnet chains, including Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Optimism, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Blast, Fantom Sonic, Scroll, Linea, Mantle, Taiko, and others. Swap and Gasless v2 APIs continue to expand, with upcoming support hinted for emerging ecosystems like Monad.

Bug bounty programs via Immunefi further validate the scope and seriousness of these deployments.

Final Assessment

0x Protocol does not compete for attention in the same way meme coins or consumer apps do. Its activity is infrastructurally measured in deployments, integrations, and governance continuity rather than viral metrics.

Twitter activity confirms maintenance and communication. Market data confirms liquidity and relevance. Governance forums confirm debate and participation. Deployment logs confirm ongoing technical work.

In aggregate, these signals point to a protocol that is neither abandoned nor stagnant but operating deliberately in a mature phase of its lifecycle.

Read Also: Will RIVER 10x From Here? Analyzing Trending Stablecoin Projects

FAQ

Is 0x Protocol still active in 2024–2025?

Yes. Twitter updates, governance discussions, and ongoing deployments across multiple chains confirm continued activity.

What does the 0x Twitter feed mainly post about?

The feed focuses on governance alerts, treasury votes, scam warnings, protocol deployments, and ecosystem updates rather than marketing campaigns.

Is ZRX still being used for governance?

Yes. ZRX remains the core governance token for ZEIPs, treasury decisions, and Snapshot voting processes.

Does 0x still power real applications?

Yes. It underpins swaps in wallets, DEX aggregators, and applications like Interface, supporting millions of tokens and large trading volumes.

Is 0x Protocol abandoned or declining?

There is no evidence of abandonment. While growth is measured, technical updates, forum discussions, and multi-chain deployments indicate sustained operations.

Bitrue Official Website:

Website: https://www.bitrue.com/

Sign Up: https://www.bitrue.com/user/register

Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.