Did James Wynn Ask for Donations? Looking at His Deleted Post

James Wynn, a controversial figure in crypto circles, made waves once again—this time for a post he allegedly made asking for $1 donations. The post, which was later deleted, raised eyebrows due to its timing and what happened after. Despite deleting the post, blockchain activity shows that Wynn received and used the funds—adding fuel to the growing scepticism surrounding his actions and intentions. With his latest high-risk Bitcoin trade and ties to a memecoin linked to Andrew Tate, the situation demands closer scrutiny.

What Did James Wynn Actually Post and Why Was It Deleted?

According to several crypto sleuths, including the well-known X user Dethective, James Wynn initially shared a now-deleted post requesting small donations—$1 per user. The reasoning behind the request wasn’t made entirely clear in the post itself, but he framed it as an effort to "fight the cabal"—a term often associated with conspiracy theories.

Interestingly, not long after publishing the post, Wynn deleted it. However, as with anything on the blockchain, records remain. Dethective shared a screenshot showing dozens of wallet addresses that sent him funds shortly after the post was made. In fact, at least 24 wallets had already sent him $1, seemingly trusting his intentions.

This situation becomes more complex considering Wynn had promised a refund. While no evidence currently suggests those refunds were made, the deletion of the post leaves a cloud of doubt. It raises ethical questions about transparency and accountability in decentralised spaces. For many, even if $1 seems trivial, the gesture implies trust—trust that may have been taken advantage of.

Even more concerning is that he has not clarified or acknowledged the deletion or the fate of the funds. Despite being contacted by media like Protos, Wynn has remained silent.

Read also: James Wynn is Marketing Hyperliquid Well, Says Wintermute

How Were the Donations Used and What Was Wynn's Trading Behaviour?

Despite the deleted post, blockchain analysis tools show that Wynn went ahead and deposited the funds—around $18,600—into Hyperliquid. This comes in addition to a previous deposit of over $20,000. These were likely proceeds from those same user donations, based on the timing and wallet movements tracked on Hypurrscan and verified by Arkham Intelligence.

What’s perhaps even more shocking is the purpose of these funds: another extremely risky trade. Wynn opened a $100 million position on Hyperliquid, betting long on Bitcoin with 40X leverage. While some would see this as simply high-risk trading, others interpret it as reckless gambling—especially considering he had previously lost a similar trade worth $100 million.

At one point, Wynn’s new position was up over $900,000. But with such a narrow margin for error, he came within $70 of liquidation—a near miss that showcases just how fragile the trade really is. His liquidation price is currently $104,930.

The use of donated funds in this way—without disclosure and in the context of a deleted post—raises serious concerns. There’s a thin line between speculative trading and exploiting public trust, and Wynn seems to be toeing that line without much caution. It serves as a reminder that transparency should never be optional in decentralised finance, especially when money changes hands under public pretence.

The Controversy Surrounding Moonpig and James Wynn's Reputation

James Wynn’s reputation is far from clean in the eyes of many within the crypto community. Apart from the ongoing mystery surrounding the deleted donation post, his involvement with the memecoin "Moonpig" adds to the controversy.

Moonpig is a coin that Wynn has been seen promoting in coordination with Andrew Tate—a figure facing serious criminal allegations, including sex trafficking. This association alone has made many observers deeply uncomfortable. Promotion of speculative assets in crypto isn’t unusual, but when it involves potentially criminal individuals, the risks extend beyond financial loss.

Some users even speculated that Wynn might be planning to launch his own token soon. That could explain the small donations—possibly a way to gauge interest or create a funding base before a token drop. Regardless of his intentions, the lack of a clear, accessible whitepaper or roadmap makes the situation deeply concerning. Transparency is minimal, and even official sources linked to Wynn have offered no clarification.

In a decentralised world, trust is currency. And when figures like Wynn repeatedly operate in opaque, ethically questionable ways, the risk of community exploitation becomes very real. For now, all that remains are unanswered questions, suspicious wallet activity, and an increasingly divided crypto community debating whether Wynn is a misunderstood trader or a manipulative opportunist.

Read also: What Is HyperEVM Chain? Unpacking HYPE Coin's Real Potential

Conclusion

James Wynn’s deleted donation post, followed by suspicious on-chain activity and a high-risk trading spree, serves as a cautionary tale in crypto. His silence amid the controversy and questionable ties to controversial figures only amplify concerns. Whether this was a poorly executed stunt or a deeper manipulation attempt, it reinforces the need for transparency in the crypto world. Until there’s more clarity—and proper disclosures—any support for related projects should be approached with great caution.

Ready to Invest in Real Crypto Assets?

If you're looking for a trusted platform to explore verified crypto assets with clear documentation and strong user reviews, consider registering on Bitrue. It’s a secure place to manage your crypto investments—away from political noise.

Register on Bitrue and start investing securely.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Did James Wynn really ask for donations?

Yes, he published a post asking for $1 donations to "fight the cabal," but it was later deleted. However, blockchain records confirm he received funds.

2. What happened to the donations?

After deleting the post, Wynn deposited over $18,000 worth of funds into his Hyperliquid account and used them to open another high-risk Bitcoin trade.

3. Is Moonpig a trustworthy crypto project?

Caution is advised. There’s limited public information about the project, and even the whitepaper on the official site appears to be inaccessible.