Is the United States in Danger? Looking at Post Missile Condition

The United States is on edge after launching airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, 2025. 

With Iran vowing retaliation and global tensions soaring, many are asking: Is the U.S. in danger? Let’s break down the situation, from the strikes to the heightened security measures and the potential risks ahead.

Want to trade crypto? Head over to Bitrue and explore your options today!

What Happened: The U.S. Strikes on Iran

On June 21, 2025, U.S. forces, using B-2 stealth bombers and over 125 aircraft, targeted Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. 

Donald Trump called the operation “Operation Midnight Hammer” a “spectacular military success,” claiming the sites were “completely obliterated” to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions. 

Satellite images show severe damage, especially at Fordo, though Iran denies significant setbacks, insisting its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Why the U.S. Acted

Trump and Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, argued that Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, posing an imminent threat. 

U.S. intelligence, however, has long assessed that Iran isn’t actively pursuing a bomb, though it has enriched uranium to high levels. The decision followed weeks of planning and intense lobbying by Israel, with Trump overriding earlier diplomatic efforts.

Read also: Iran Israel Update: Is the US Joining the War?

Immediate Fallout: Iran’s Response and U.S. Alert Status

Iran’s leadership, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, condemned the strikes as a violation of international law. 

Iran launched about 30 missiles at Israel on June 22, causing injuries and damage, and has threatened a “decisive response” against the U.S. Araghchi warned of “everlasting consequences,” and Iran’s parliament voted to consider closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil route, which could spike global oil prices.

U.S. on High Alert

In response, the U.S. has ramped up security:

• Major Cities: New York and Los Angeles deployed extra police to protect religious, cultural, and diplomatic sites. The NYPD issued an advisory, coordinating with federal partners.

• Government Warnings: The Department of Homeland Security flagged a “heightened threat environment,” while the State Department issued a worldwide caution alert, urging U.S. citizens abroad to stay vigilant.

• Military Posture: The 40,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East are on high alert, with bases across the region prepared for potential attacks from Iran or its proxies, like Shiite militias in Iraq or Houthi forces in Yemen.

Trump’s Mixed Messages

Trump has oscillated between calls for peace and provocative rhetoric. 

He warned Iran that any retaliation would face “force far greater” than the initial strikes and floated the idea of “regime change” on Truth Social, despite Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisting the goal was not to topple Iran’s government. 

This contradiction has fueled confusion and concern about U.S. intentions.

Read more: US Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady, Defying Calls for Cuts Amid Economic Uncertainty

Global and Domestic Reactions

International Response

The strikes drew mixed reactions:

• Israel: Netanyahu praised Trump’s “bold decision,” calling it a historic move to deny Iran nuclear weapons.

• Allies: Japan and Australia supported the U.S. but urged de-escalation, while Russia and China condemned the strikes. UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned of a “cycle of destruction.”

• Oil Markets: Brent crude prices jumped 2.4% to $78.83 per barrel, reflecting fears of disrupted oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

U.S. Political Divide

Domestically, the strikes sparked debate:

• Supporters: Republican senators like Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham backed Trump, calling the attack necessary to counter Iran’s threat.

• Critics: Democrats like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senator Bernie Sanders criticized Trump for bypassing Congress, comparing the move to the 2003 Iraq invasion. Some Republicans, including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also opposed the strikes, arguing they violate Trump’s anti-interventionist stance.

Read more: David Sacks Reveals U.S. Could Acquire More Bitcoin: What It Means for the Future

The Risks: Is the U.S. in Danger?

The U.S. faces several potential threats:

• Direct Retaliation: Iran could target U.S. bases in the Middle East, with over 20 possible sites identified. It might also use drones or fast boats to attack U.S. Navy ships.

• Proxy Attacks: Iran’s weakened proxies, like Hezbollah and Hamas, may still strike U.S. interests. Sleeper-cell attacks inside the U.S., warned about before the strikes, are a concern.

• Economic Impact: Closing the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt 20% of global oil supplies, hitting U.S. consumers with higher gas prices.

• Wider Conflict: The strikes risk pulling the U.S. into a prolonged war, contradicting Trump’s promise to avoid Middle East entanglements.

Expert Insights

Analysts are divided. Some, like former National Security Council spokesperson Tommy Vietor, warn that Iran could retaliate unpredictably, even years later. 

Others, like security expert Deborah Haynes, note that the strikes may have set back Iran’s nuclear program significantly, reducing the immediate threat. The International Atomic Energy Agency reported no off-site radiation leaks, easing fears of environmental fallout.

What’s Next?

The U.S. is bracing for Iran’s response while navigating domestic and global pressure. 

Trump is set to meet his national security team on June 23 and attend a NATO summit on June 24, where the crisis will likely dominate discussions. Iran’s foreign minister is in Moscow, seeking support from Russia, but there’s little sign of military aid.

Can Diplomacy Prevail?

The State Department, via Secretary Marco Rubio, has signaled openness to diplomacy, offering Iran a chance to negotiate a nuclear deal. However, Iran’s insistence on retaliation before talks complicates the path forward.

Conclusion

The U.S. is undeniably at risk following its strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. Heightened security, military alertness, and global economic jitters reflect the gravity of the moment. 

While Iran’s ability to retaliate may be limited, the threat of proxy attacks or economic disruption looms large. 

Trump’s rhetoric, mixing peace offers with regime change hints, adds uncertainty. The U.S. has shown military might, but avoiding a wider war will require deft diplomacy and restraint from all sides. For now, the nation watches and waits, hoping cooler heads prevail.

FAQ

Q1: How did the U.S. carry out the strike on Iran’s nuclear sites?

A1: The U.S. used B-2 stealth bombers and over 125 aircraft in “Operation Midnight Hammer” to hit Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan on June 21, 2025.

Q2: What threats is the U.S. facing now?

A2: Iran may launch direct attacks on U.S. bases, proxy strikes via militias, or disrupt oil flows by closing the Strait of Hormuz, raising both security and economic risks.

Q3: Is the U.S. preparing for more conflict?

A3: Yes. 40,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East are on high alert, major cities are boosting security, and global diplomacy is on standby, but retaliation from Iran is expected.

Bitrue Official Website: 

Website: https://www.bitrue.com/

Sign Up: https://www.bitrue.com/user/register

Disclaimer: The views expressed belong exclusively to the author and do not reflect the views of this platform. This platform and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy or suitability of the information provided. It is for informational purposes only and not intended as financial or investment advice.